MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2910070395 · doi:10.1109/icmla.2018.00197

A New Strategy for Rotating Machinery Fault Diagnosis Under Varying Speed Conditions Based on Deep Neural Networks and Order Tracking

2018· article· en· W2910070395 on OpenAlexaff
Meng Rao, Ming J. Zuo

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFault (geology)Artificial neural networkComputer scienceTracking (education)Bearing (navigation)Control theory (sociology)Artificial intelligenceControl engineeringWork (physics)EngineeringMechanical engineeringControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rotating machines are widely used in industry and often work under harsh and varying speed conditions. Fault diagnosis under varying speed conditions is needed to prevent major shutdowns. This paper aims to develop an intelligent rotating machinery fault diagnosis strategy based on deep neural networks (DNNs) and order tracking (OT). The developed strategy can automatically conduct rotating machinery fault diagnosis under both constant and varying speed conditions. Case studies on a rolling element bearing dataset and a fixed-shaft gearbox dataset show the superiority in diagnosis accuracy of the proposed strategy over reported approaches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.834
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMachine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207