MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2910104274 · doi:10.1101/509554

10Kin1day: A bottom-up neuroimaging initiative

2019· preprint· en· W2910104274 on OpenAlexafffund
Martijn P. van den Heuvel, Lianne H. Scholtens, Hannelore K. van der Burgh, Fredica Agosta, Clara Alloza, Tiffany M C Avancini, Simon Baron‐Cohen, Silvia Basaia, Manon J.N.L. Benders, Frauke Beyer, Linda Booij, Kees P. J. Braun, Wiepke Cahn, Dara M. Cannon, Sandra SM Chan, Eric Chen, Michael Lombardo, Benedicto Crespo‐Facorro, Eveline A. Crone, Udo Dannlowski, Sonja M. C. de Zwarte, Ana M. Díaz‐Zuluaga, Bruno Dietsche, Stefan S. du Plessis, Sarah Durston, Robin Emsley, Geraldo F. Busatto, Massimo Filippi, Thomas Frodl, Dariusz Gąsecki, Joanna Goc, Martin Gorges, Beata Graff, Dominik Grotegerd, Julie M. Hall, Laurena Holleran, Helene Hopman, Lutz Jäncke, Andreas Jansen, Krzysztof Jodzio, Vasiliy G. Kaleda, Jan Kassubek, Shahrzad Kharabian Masouleh, Tilo Kircher, Martijn Koevoets, Axel Krug, Stephen M. Lawrie, И. С. Лебедева, Edwin Lee, Tristram A. Lett, Simon J.G. Lewis, Franziskus Liem, Carlos López‐Jaramillo, Daniel S. Margulies, Sebastian Markett, Paulo Marques, Ignacio Martínez‐Zalacaín, Colm McDonald, Andrew M. McIntosh, Genevieve McPhilemy, Susanne Meinert, José M. Menchón, Susan Mérillat, Christian Montag, Pedro Silva Moreira, Pedro Morgado, David Mothersill, Hans‐Peter Müller, Leila Nabulsi, Pablo Najt, Krzysztof Narkiewicz, Patrycja Naumczyk, Sebastiaan WF Neggers, Bob Oranje, Víctor Ortiz‐García de la Foz, Jiska S. Peper, Julian A Pineda Z., Paul E. Rasser, Ronny Redlich, Jonathan Repple, Martin Reuter, Pedro GP Rosa, Amber Ruigrok, Agnieszka Sabisz, Ulrich Schall, Soraya Seedat, Maurício H. Serpa, Devon Shook, Stavros Skouras, Carles Soriano‐Mas, Nuno Sousa, Edyta Szurowska, A. S. Tomyshev, Diana Tordesillas‐Gutiérrez, Leonardo Tozzi, Sofie L. Valk, Leonard H. van den Berg, Theo G.M. van Erp, Neeltje EM van Haren, Judith JMC van Leeuwen, Arno Villringer, Christiaan H. Vinkers, Christian Vollmar, Lea Waller, Henrik Walter, Heather C. Whalley, M Witkowska, A. Veronica Witte, Marcus V. Zanetti, Rui Zhang, Gary Donohoe, Veronica O’Keane, Siemon C. de Lange

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2019
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNIH Blueprint for Neuroscience ResearchNational Center for Research ResourcesHealth and Medical Research FundInstituto de Salud Carlos IIIMedical Research CouncilCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMcDonnell Center for Systems NeuroscienceNational Institutes of HealthWestern Sydney UniversityInternational Max Planck Research School for Advanced Methods in Process and Systems EngineeringWellcome TrustNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekMeath FoundationDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftScience Foundation IrelandAustralian Schizophrenia Research BankBundesamt für GesundheitUniversiteit UtrechtEuropean CommissionVelux StiftungNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchNational Health and Medical Research CouncilRussian Foundation for Basic Research
KeywordsNeuroimagingHuman Connectome ProjectConnectomeEvent (particle physics)Data scienceComputer scienceTop-down and bottom-up designNeurosciencePsychologyFunctional connectivityCognitive science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We organized 10Kin1day, a pop-up scientific event with the goal to bring together neuroimaging groups from around the world to jointly analyze 10,000+ existing MRI connectivity datasets during a 3-day workshop. In this report, we describe the motivation and principles of 10Kin1day, together with a public release of 8,000+ MRI connectome maps of the human brain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.028
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.148

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0280.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0110.008
Open science0.0060.024
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0380.028

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies→French-language works237,207→