MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2910112765 · doi:10.5539/ijms.v11n1p40

Study on the Influencing Factors and Consumer Behaviors of Bicycle Sharing in Beijing

2019· article· en· W2910112765 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lijuan Wang, Songbai Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Marketing Studies · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicSharing Economy and Platforms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBeijingAffect (linguistics)BusinessMarketingSample (material)PopulationConsumer marketConsumer behaviourAdvertisingPsychologyGeographyEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper aims to explore the factors that affect consumer behavior in Beijing bicycle sharing. According to the questionnaire survey, perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use have positive impacts on consumer intentions. However, owing to the relatively high income of the sample population, the economic cost is also positively related to the intentions of consumers, and consumers’ intentions are negatively related to actual behavior. This study provides a new contribution to the literature and a business opportunity. This study also provides a reference for market segmentation and the target population of the sharing economy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.236

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Marketing StudiesSame topicSharing Economy and PlatformsFrench-language works237,207