MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2910177504

Формирование социально-философского дискурса сетевого общества

2016· article· uk· W2910177504 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueФілософія та політологія в контексті сучасної культури · 2016
Typearticle
Languageuk
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicJournalism and Media Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSociologyNorwegianMedia studiesSocial sciencePhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Theoretical discourse of social network formed through the efforts of Canadian sociologists Paul Craven and Barry Wellman, the Canadian philosopher Herbert Marshall McLuhan, British specialist in developing methodology of software James Martin, the Norwegian sociologist Stein Brаten, American professors of computer and information sciences Starr Roxanne Hiltz and Murray Turoff, the American sociologist Randall Collins, the Dutch sociologist Jan van Dyke, the Spanish sociologist Manuel Castells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.535
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it