MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2910191320 · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-08197-4

Penaeid shrimp genome provides insights into benthic adaptation and frequent molting

2019· article· en· W2910191320 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaojun Zhang, Jianbo Yuan, Yamin Sun, Shihao Li, Yi Gao, Yang Yu, Chengzhang Liu, Quanchao Wang, Xinjia Lv, Xiaoxi Zhang, Ka Yan, Xiaobo Wang, Wenchao Lin, Long Wang, Xueli Zhu, Chengsong Zhang, Jiquan Zhang, Songjun Jin, Kuijie Yu, Jie Kong, Peng Xu, Jack Chen, Hong‐Bin Zhang, Patrick Sorgeloos, Amir Sagi, Acacia Alcivar‐Warren, Zhanjiang Liu, Lei Wang, Jue Ruan, Ka Hou Chu, Bin Liu, Fuhua Li, Jianhai Xiang

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Communications · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicInvertebrate Immune Response Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersBeijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of SciencesChinese Academy of SciencesNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsShrimpBiologyGenomeAdaptation (eye)Whole genome sequencingEvolutionary biologyGeneFisheryGeneticsEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Crustacea, the subphylum of Arthropoda which dominates the aquatic environment, is of major importance in ecology and fisheries. Here we report the genome sequence of the Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei, covering ~1.66 Gb (scaffold N50 605.56 Kb) with 25,596 protein-coding genes and a high proportion of simple sequence repeats (>23.93%). The expansion of genes related to vision and locomotion is probably central to its benthic adaptation. Frequent molting of the shrimp may be explained by an intensified ecdysone signal pathway through gene expansion and positive selection. As an important aquaculture organism, L. vannamei has been subjected to high selection pressure during the past 30 years of breeding, and this has had a considerable impact on its genome. Decoding the L. vannamei genome not only provides an insight into the genetic underpinnings of specific biological processes, but also provides valuable information for enhancing crustacean aquaculture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations571
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature CommunicationsSame topicInvertebrate Immune Response MechanismsFrench-language works237,207