Investigation of the Lewis acidic behaviour of an oxygen-bridged planarized triphenylborane toward amines and the properties of their Lewis acid–base adducts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lewis acid behavior of an oxygen-bridged triphenylborane (1) to amines and the properties of Lewis acid-base adducts of 1 with amines have been investigated. UV-vis titration and 11B NMR experiments showed the formation of Lewis acid-base adducts of 1 with pyridine, DMAP, quinuclidine, and DABCO, respectively (1·amine). X-ray crystallographic analysis revealed that the planar shape of 1 was converted to a bowl shape by the formation of 1·amine. Interestingly, 1·quinuclidine, 12·DABCO, and 1·DABCO exhibited dual emissions. Excitation spectra and photoluminescence decay time measurements suggest that the dual emissions were ascribed to two excited species, i.e., [1·amine]* and [1]* generated by photodissociation in the excited states.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".