MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2910254118 · doi:10.4095/211925

Streamflow in the Mackenzie valley

2000· report· en· W2910254118 on OpenAlexaff
G R Brooks

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCryospheric studies and observations
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStreamflowGeographyHydrology (agriculture)Environmental scienceGeologyCartographyGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rivers in the Mackenzie valley generally exhibit a spring-snowmelt dominated mean monthly flow pattern classified as a subarctic, nival flow regime. Along the Mackenzie River, ice jamming during spring breakup is an important process since it can obstruct flow locally and elevate river stage to flood levels. Flow along the large tributary rivers draining the Mackenzie Mountains to the west of the Mackenzie River can rise and fall rapidly in response to rain storms and diurnal snow melt. Global climatic change may result in an increase in the magnitude and frequency of extreme floods, in common with mid-latitude rivers. Some hydraulic modelling suggests that precipitation, and therefore runoff, will increase, but other models indicate that the increased precipitation will be offset by greater evapotranspiration. Considerably more immediate and drastic changes to the flow regime of a given river could arise from dam construction for hydroelectric generation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.840
Threshold uncertainty score0.318

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCryospheric studies and observations→French-language works237,207→