MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2910271323 · doi:10.1289/isee.2013.p-2-18-03

Cumulative Lead Exposure and Age-Related Cataract in Middle-Aged and Elderly Women

2013· article· en· W2910271323 on OpenAlexaff
Sung Kyun Park, Debra A. Schaumberg, Marc G. Weisskopf, Howard Hu, Susan Korrick

Bibliographic record

VenueISEE Conference Abstracts · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMercury impact and mitigation studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInterquartile rangeOdds ratioCataractsConfidence intervalCataract surgeryBody mass indexConfoundingLead poisoningInternal medicineSurgeryOphthalmology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Age-related cataract is the leading cause of blindness and visual impairment worldwide, accounting for more than 40% of global blindness. Lead has been proposed as a potentially important risk factor. Possible mechanisms include lead-induced changes in the lens through redox status, glutathione metabolism, lipid peroxidation, post-translational protein modification, and calcium homeostasis. However, only one epidemiologic study has examined the association between cumulative lead exposure and age-related cataract and it was limited to men. Aim: We examined the association of cumulative lead exposure with the risk of age-related cataract in middle-aged and elderly women. Methods: Participants were 502 Boston area participants in the Nurses' Health Study (mean age=63 yrs, range 55-74 yrs) who had lead exposure assessments done in two substudies (bone lead measured in 1993-1995 and 2001-2004), had cataract extraction from 5 years before the bone lead measurement to 2008, and whose cataracts were not congenital or secondary to chronic steroid use, previous intraocular surgery or ocular trauma. We identified cases of cataract extraction by a biennial questionnaire and confirmed all cases with review of medical records. Bone lead levels were measured by K-x-ray fluorescence. We used logistic regression to compute the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for an interquartile range (IQR) increase in bone lead. Results: We identified 48 cases (9.6%) of cataract extraction. After controlling for substudy, age, smoking, and body mass index, neither bone lead measure was associated with cataract (OR=0.80 (95% CI, 0.51, 1.24) for tibia lead (IQR=11 µg/g); OR=0.98 (95% CI, 0.62, 1.53) for patella lead (IQR=13 µg/g). Conclusions: The present study does not support the hypothesis that cumulative lead exposure increases the risk of age-related cataract in women, but further research in larger populations is needed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueISEE Conference AbstractsSame topicMercury impact and mitigation studiesFrench-language works237,207