MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2910273018 · doi:10.4095/226150

Eurekan fault tectonics on Judge Daly Promontory and their implications for displacements along Nares Strait

2008· report· en· W2910273018 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Werner von Gosen, Karsten Piepjohn, F. Tessensohn, Kerstin Saalmann

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPromontoryGeologyFault (geology)SeismologyTectonicsGeodesyPaleontologyCartographyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On Judge Daly Promontory, faults cut through a lower Paleozoic sedimentary succession and also affect small Paleocene occurrences. Structural analyses suggest that displacements were caused by a sinistral transpressive regime under north-northwest - south-southeast to northwest - southeast compression, which led to the formation of major faults and fault zones displaying sinistral, oblique, or reverse displacements. The deformational history is interpreted to have taken place in two stages: sinistral pull-apart graben formation during the Paleocene, followed by compression in the Eocene, and involved reactivation of former sinistral strike-slip faults. In a plate-tectonic scenario these two stages of deformation suggest that displacements along the Wegener Fault were related to 1) the sinistral displacement of the North American plate with respect to Greenland, and 2) the northward drift of Greenland as a result of combined seafloor spreading in the North Atlantic and Labrador Sea. The amount of left-lateral movement along the Wegener Fault does not support the existence of a plate boundary in Nares Strait.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.868
Threshold uncertainty score0.263

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research→French-language works237,207→