Effects of enucleation on the direct reciprocal corticocortical connections between primary visual and somatosensory cortices of the mouse
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Multisensory convergence is present in the cerebral cortex even at the initial stages of processing in the primary and low-level sensory cortices. Direct connections between primary sensory cortices are a particular feature of rodent cortical connectivity. Our previous studies have shown asymmetric projections between the primary visual and somatosensory cortices in mice. Binocular enucleation produces a relative reduction of the projections from the somatosensory cortex to the visual cortex in mice. The purpose of this study is to compare the direct reciprocal cross-modal connections between the primary visual (V1) and somatosensory (S1) cortices in intact and enucleated C57Bl/6 mice, and to determine quantitative differences in the proportion and laminar distribution of neurons and terminals in these projections. CTB labeled neurons were used to estimate the relative importance of projections between V1 and S1, and their laminar distribution used to classify them as feedback, feedforward or lateral projections. The size of axonal swellings was measured and frequency distribution determined for each cortical layer. Axon diameters were also sampled in these connections. Injections in V1 resulted in a reduced proportion of labeled cells in S1 of enucleated mice. There was a relative decrease of the projection from the somatosensory cortex to the visual cortex in enucleated mice due to a greater relative reduction of supragranular layers neurons. Enucleation otherwise had no effect on the connectivity of the somatosensory cortex with other motor and somatosensory cortices. In the projection from the visual to the somatosensory cortex in enucleated mice, the size of axonal swellings was reduced in all layers. Conversely, in the projection from the somatosensory cortex to the visual cortex, some larger swellings appeared in the supragranular layers. This shows pathway and laminar specific changes in cortical circuitry following loss of sensory afferent activity that results in changes in the relationship between visual and somatosensory cortices in the enucleated mice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".