MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2910278487 · doi:10.4095/216138

Geological setting of listwanite (carbonated serpentinite) at Atlin, British Columbia: implications for CO2 sequestration and lode-gold mineralization

2004· report· en· W2910278487 on OpenAlexaffabout
Lyle D. Hansen, R G Anderson, Gregory M. Dipple, K Nakano

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLodeMineralization (soil science)GeologyCarbon sequestrationGeochemistryEarth scienceMining engineeringChemistrySoil scienceCarbon dioxideSoil water

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Carbonate-altered serpentinite (listwanite) is commonly associated with gold mineralization, but also binds large quantities of the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide. At Atlin, listwanite alteration progressed through three carbonation reactions that resulted in the same overall mineral transformations as proposed for the industrial sequestration of anthropogenic CO2 by the process of mineral carbonation. Therefore, alteration of serpentinite to listwanite serves as a natural analogue to CO2 sequestration. Listwanite alteration is concentrated along faults and two orthogonal fracture sets, and extends tens of metres into the wall rock. One fracture orientation is preferentially mineralized. The carbonation reactions most distal to the fracture system consume olivine and brucite, and record grain-scale percolation of CO2-bearing fluids into serpentinite hundreds of metres from visible carbonate alteration. These previously unrecognized reactions may be relevant for in situ CO2 sequestration. Extensive carbonation in the carbonate alteration systems generated fracture permeability that promoted further infiltration and may have accelerated carbonation and gold mineralization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.078

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207