MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2910293858 · doi:10.4095/211887

Environmental response to climate change in the Canadian High Arctic

2000· report· en· W2910293858 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michelle Garneau, B T Alt

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClimate changeArcticThe arcticClimatologyEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental changeGeographyEnvironmental resource managementPhysical geographyOceanographyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fosheim Peninsula is the largest interior lowland of the protected, anomalously warm, dry, Eureka Sound intermontane area, which lies in the circumpolar-vortex-dominated Canadian High Arctic. The climate of this latter region is characterized by high, longitudinal temperature variations, strong, persistent temperature inversions, and widely differing precipitation totals. Climate and related trends for 1961 to 1990 were used to delineate climate change regions around the circumarctic area and to examine their response to recent global climate conditions. General circulation model results for doubled CO2 scenarios show least agreement in this geographical area, with only a transient model with a coupled ocean circulation model reflecting the current observed trends. Because of the anomalous conditions of the Eureka Sound area within the eastern Canadian High Arctic and similarly of the latter region within the circumpolar Arctic, close monitoring and interdisciplinary research are warranted to understand the climate processes involved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.132

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations51
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicClimate change and permafrostFrench-language works237,207