MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2910295795 · doi:10.4095/213202

Preliminary results of the Flin Flon Targeted Geoscience Initiative, Saskatchewan and Manitoba

2002· report· en· W2910295795 on OpenAlexaffabout
A G Galley, A H Bailes, Harold Gibson, G Tourgny, D E Ames, Christine Devine, George Gale, I R Jonasson, Dianne Edith Mitchinson, Nicole Tardif, Bruce E. Taylor

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of the Flin Flon Targeted Geoscience Initiative is to ensure the future of thenorthern mining community of Flin Flon, Manitoba by working with the local mining and exploration companiesto gain a better understanding of the volcanic setting and hydrothermal signatures of the region'svolcanogenic massive sulphide deposits. The Geological Survey of Canada Manitoba Saskatche-wan Laurentian Univeristy project includes regional-scale and detailed oxygen isotope, mineral-chemical,and sulphide trace-element studies, and a 1:10 000 scale crossborder geological compilation of the Flin FlonDomain. Detailed studies include an alteration study of the Baker Patton rhyolite complex, and studies ofvolcanic architecture and hydrothermal evolution of the host stratigraphy to the auriferous Flin Flon Triple7 Callinan volcanogenic massive sulphide deposits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.117

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping→French-language works237,207→