MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2910320029 · doi:10.4095/292099

Sedimentary architecture of a deeply karsted Precambrian - Cambrian unconformity, Victoria Island, Northwest Territories

2013· report· en· W2910320029 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jordan Mathieu, Elizabeth C. Turner, R H Rainbird

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrecambrianUnconformityGeologyArchitectureSedimentary rockPaleontologyArchaeologyGeomorphologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A deeply karsted unconformity separates Proterozoic carbonate rocks of the Wynniatt Formation from overlying Cambrian sandstone near the head of Minto Inlet on Victoria Island, Arctic Canada. Sandstone-filled paleocaverns, hundreds of metres wide and tens of metres high, are present approximately 10 to 15 m stratigraphically below the nominal stratigraphic contact between Proterozoic and Cambrian rocks; the position of the paleocaves relative to the main unconformity surface suggests development along a paleointerface possibly associated with the water table. Gryke networks and karstic towers are present in the Wynniatt Formation at the unconformity. Crossbedded sandstone that overlies the unconformity contains unusual, vertical columnar sandstone structures, decimetres to metres in diameter, which cut sharply across bedding and contain weak concentric layering. These pillar-like structures are attributed to water escape through submarine springs, where groundwater flowing through the karst network emerged onto the Cambrian seafloor. The pillars are most densely clustered in the most northern exposure of the sandstone, and diminish in abundance southward, suggesting that the coastline and the source of hydraulic head were to the north of the study area.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.133
Threshold uncertainty score0.268

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological Studies and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207