Petrophysical properties of mineralized and nonmineralized rocks from Giant and Con mine areas, Northwest Territories
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Petrophysical measurements, including electrical resistivity, effective porosity, and bulk density, have been performed on ten mineralized and nonmineralized rock samples from the Giant mine and Con mine areas (Northwest Territories). The purpose was to determine the petrophysical characteristics of these rocks and provide information required to determine their electrical conductivity mechanism and to aid interpretation of down-hole, ground, and airborne electromagnetic survey data. Results indicate that bulk densities (dB) are in the range of 2.86-3.13 g/mL. Effective porosities (øE) range from 0.40% to 3.03%, with the øE values for samples from the Con mine area being generally smaller (0.40-1.16%) than those from the Giant mine area (0.42-3.13%). Bulk electrical resistivities (rr) are in the range of 37-2.4 x 10exp4 ohm·m, for these samples. The moderately to strongly foliated texture of these samples result in electrical resistivity anisotropy values of 2:1 to 46:1.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".