MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2910366121 · doi:10.4095/212157

The unconformable character and paleogeographic significance of the Chazy-Black River group contact, Montréal area, southwestern Quebec

2001· report· en· W2910366121 on OpenAlexaffabout
Osman Salad Hersi, Denis Lavoie

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Formations and Processes Exploration
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCharacter (mathematics)Group (periodic table)GeographyArchaeologyGeologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An unconformity marks the Chazy-Black River group contact in southwestern Quebec. It is characterized by an eastward pinching out of the Pamelia Formation (Black River Group), borings, and truncation of the Chazy strata. Coarse-grained sandstone of the Pamelia Formation or Lowville Formation (where the former is missing) lies above the contact. Lithological differences between dolostone units in the Laval (Chazy Group) and Pamelia for- mations were recognized, allowing us to better position the contact. The Pamelia Formation (44 mthick) in eastern Ontario conformably overlies the Chazyan strata. From Montréal to Québec progressively younger Black River strata onlap older rocks. This onlapping is accompanied by substantial lithological changes where sandstone and different limestone lithofacies are preserved. These variations suggest a more limited accommodation space for the Black River strata in southwestern Quebec, and, therefore uplifting relative to eastern Ontario. This uplifting is probably due to old structural lineaments reactivation by the then ongoing Taconian Orogeny, and may indicate an incipient upthrow of the Beauharnois anticline.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.092

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological Formations and Processes ExplorationFrench-language works237,207