MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2910366613 · doi:10.4095/223793

Sequence stratigraphy, hydrostratigraphy, and mineralizing fluid flow in the Proterozoic Manitou Falls Formation, eastern Athabasca Basin, Saskatchewan

2007· report· en· W2910366613 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Eric E. Hiatt, Kurt Kyser

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologySequence (biology)ProterozoicSequence stratigraphyStructural basinStratigraphyGeochemistryPaleontologyChemistrySedimentary depositional environment

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Manitou Falls Formation, deposited during the early evolution of the eastern Athabasca Basin, is composed of flat-lying, unmetamorphosed sandstone and conglomerate that change stratigraphically upward from polymictic pebble conglomerate to medium-grained quartz arenite. This succession has been subdivided into lithofacies that are diachronous by nature. Variations in lithofacies and paleoenvironment are useful for lithostratigraphic correlation, but do not allow resolution of chronostratigraphic horizons. Drill cores along two transects were studied, thickness of fluvial fining-upward successions were recorded, and these were plotted stratigraphically. Thickness of fining-upward intervals is used as a proxy for accommodation. These show systematic changes from times of low accommodation marked by coarse-grained intervals followed by gradual shifts to greater accommodation and finer grained intervals. A hydrostratigraphic model for the eastern Athabasca Basin is presented based on integration of sedimentology, sequence stratigraphy, and diagenesis. The two basal sequences contain aquifers that onlap basement rock units eastward and focused burial brines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.232
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological formations and processesFrench-language works237,207