PENERAPAN NETWORK PLANNING PADA PROYEK PEMBANGUNAN PERUMAHAN MUTIARA RESIDENCE DI DESA PENGAMBENGAN KABUPATEN JEMBRANA
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT
 The increasing number of construction companies in Indonesia poses a challenge for companies to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of resource management in order to excel among competitors. The purpose of this study is to determine whether the implementation of Network Planning can improve efficiency and effectiveness in the allocation of time and cost on the construction project. The research method is a case study to address the problem at Putra Dewata PT Karya Tama concerning network planning of Mutiara Residence Housing project. Data analysis technique used is Critical Path Method. The results show that the project completion time is 142.5 days, 14.5 days faster than the calculation result by the company with Gantt Chart method. This will provide benefits in terms of cost of completion of the project, where cost efficiencies that can be gained is Rp. 20,807,500.
 
 Keywords: network planning, critical path method, critical path.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it