The Impact of the Intellectual Capital of the University Administration in Achieving the Quality of Education
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The rational and entrepreneurial universities are working in the possession of an important resource, which is the intellectual capital, to reach the local and  global leadership, Such study aims at stating the intellectual capital impact of the rational university administration in accomplishing its quality of education since the study population consisted of both public and private Jordanian University while the study sample reached to (45) faculty members were chosen randomly and were working in such Universities, a questionnaire has been designed and distributed on (45) faculty members of the study population, who were working in such Universities, for the purpose of achieving the study aims as well as the essential statistical exams have been conducted whereas the findings showed that there is an impact of the intellectual capital) for the rational University administration of the different kinds of the Universities (the humankind, the structural, and the relational in achieving its quality of education while the study recommendations revolve around the necessity of the Universities in identifying the intellectual capital and determining the practical means to preserve and improve it in order to guarantee its quality of education.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".