MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2910508398 · doi:10.2166/wst.2019.010

Selenium in wastewater: fast analysis method development and advanced oxidation treatment applications

2019· article· en· W2910508398 on OpenAlexaff
Dipti Prakash Mohapatra, Deepak M. Kirpalani

Bibliographic record

VenueWater Science & Technology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicSelenium in Biological Systems
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeleniumChemistryMalachite greenSelenateWastewaterBioaccumulationEnvironmental chemistryPollutantAdsorptionEnvironmental engineeringEnvironmental scienceOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Selenium, a ubiquitous non-metal in nature, is potentially toxic to natural ecosystems due to its bioaccumulation potential. Due to increased monitoring and enforcement of selenium regulations, the need to be able to measure and treat selenium efficiently has taken on an increased importance. The principal aqueous forms of inorganic selenium are selenite (Se(IV)) and selenate (Se(VI)). Selenate, due to its high mobility and lack of affinity to conventional adsorbents, is typically much more difficult to treat and remove. To address both measurement and removal, an analytical method is reported for quantification of selenium in wastewater (WW) using UV-Vis spectrophotometer followed by removal studies using advanced oxidation processes (AOPs). Malachite green and azure blue were selected for colorimetric analysis using UV-Vis. Malachite green indicator showed the best results for analysis. The reported UV-Vis method was applied to establish the effect of AOPs on selenium removal. It was noted that all of the AOP treated samples showed removal of selenium and it was established that the UV-Vis method has a lower limit of detection at 2 mg/L. Further, through this study, it was found that the chemical cavitation yield and selenium removal efficiency peaked at low frequency ultrasound of 40 kHz.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.088
Threshold uncertainty score0.393

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWater Science & TechnologySame topicSelenium in Biological SystemsFrench-language works237,207