MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2910529342 · doi:10.4324/9780415963619-1

Introduction: Goals and Research Framework for Studying Immigrant Youth

2006· book-chapter· en· W2910529342 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePsychology Press eBooks · 2006
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and experiences of immigrants and refugees
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmigrationPolitical scienceSociologyPsychologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This introduction presents an overview of the key concepts discussed in the subsequent chapters of this book. The book examines the nature of cultural diversity and the role that it may play in the acculturation and adaptation of immigrant youth. It explores differences in intercultural variables and adaptation in relation to time since immigration. The book analyses heir intercultural contacts, their language, their identifications with the national society and ethnic communities, and the quality of their lives as they live in these culturally diverse societies. As for youth everywhere, immigrant youth must deal with the transition between childhood and adulthood. An understanding of the role of development in the adaptation of immigrant youth requires consideration of both developmental and acculturative changes. Several models have been suggested to explain the differing outcomes for immigrant youth, based on work with particular groups of adolescents, but research does not provide clear support for a single model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.879
Threshold uncertainty score0.968

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.164
GPT teacher head0.452
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it