MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2910533513 · doi:10.1353/jeu.2018.0022

Children's Literature and the Classics

2018· article· en· W2910533513 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mark Golden

Bibliographic record

VenueJeunesse Young People Texts Cultures · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicThemes in Literature Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMAGIC (telescope)LiteratureStyle (visual arts)ClassicsPower (physics)Privilege (computing)HistoryArtLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Children's Literature and the Classics Mark Golden (bio) Hodkinson, Owen, and Lovatt, Helen, editors. Classical Reception and Children's Literature: Greece, Rome and Childhood Transformation. I. B. Tauris, 2018. 352 pp. $110.00 hc. ISBN 9781788310208. Innovative and instructive, this excellent collection includes contributions from an author of more than thirty books for young readers and others (Michael Cadnum), several distinguished classicists (Edith Hall, Owen Hodkinson, Helen Lovatt, Sheila Murnaghan, Deborah H. Roberts, Niall Slater) and a nine-year-old saxophonist (Caroline Lovatt). Ancient authors range chronologically from Aesop to Apuleius, modern ones from William Godwin to J. K. Rowling and beyond. The collection is almost entirely restricted, however, to anglophone receptions of antiquity.1 The volume is arranged in five sections. The first opens with a helpful introduction by the editors, justifying the focus on transformation: change is a constant for children; literature for young readers adapts style and content to suit its audience; ideas of what is age appropriate alter as well (1-37). After offering broad definitions of children's literature—with its distinctive genres, such as alphabet books; its characteristic brevity; its moral or didactic intent—and reception studies, the editors pick out some motifs that recur in the contributors' chapters: gender and class, identification and othering, image and text. Helen Lovatt then presents a case study of classical allusions in the Harry Potter books. Exotic but familiar to English readers, Latin figures as a means to power and privilege, the language of magic. This is followed by full summaries of individual chapters. The introductory section closes with an imaginative triptych: Michael Cadnum's account of his short novel Nightsong (in chapter 1: "Beyond the World: Gossip, Murder and the Legend of Orpheus," 38-49), Owen Hodkinson's interview with him (chapter 2, 50-63), and Hodkinson's critical study of two of Cadnum's versions [End Page 161] of Ovid, Nightsong and Starfall ("Michael Cadnum's Metamorphoses of Ovid," 64-86). Cadnum discusses his preference for the voice and point of view of young characters and reveals the impact of his mother's illness on his reimagining of the story of Orpheus, in which Eurydice's spirit inspires the singer to take up his lyre once again in order to heal an injured boy. Cadnum insists that he writes with no specific audience in mind; he asserts that if he is thought of as a writer of children's literature, this is the result of decisions made by publishers, booksellers, and reviewers. The interview returns to this issue, exploring Cadnum's interest in myths: in his opinion, such tropes as the Turmoil of Adolescence are myths we live through. Cadnum avoids slavery in his fiction because the subject is so important that it must take the centre of any story; sexuality also plays no part because the "mythical world is pre-sexual, speaking to a part of our imagination before we had sexual partners" (61). Another feature of his fiction that seems to suit young readers, its brevity, is ascribed to his respect for silence. Hodkinson's own presentation expresses some skepticism about all this—reception theory insists that a text's meaning is not solely or even mainly under the control of its author—and comments perceptively on Ovidian features in Cadnum's work. Hodkinson concludes that the study of Cadnum's youthful voices opens up new perspectives on Ovid's naive and childlike characters (for example, Scylla). Part I, "Changing Times," contains two broad brush strokes: Edith Hall's "Aesop the Morphing Fabulist" (89-107) explores the reach of Aesop's fables, imported into Greece from the ancient Near East 2500 years ago and now rivalled only by the Bible in ubiquity. Translated into Tamil in 1969, into Bosnian in 1994, into Kurdish in 2002, Aesop in the native tongue has become a marker of nationhood. The work's universality is in part the consequence of its similarity to Jesus's parables and its compatibility with the moral teachings of Christianity—missionaries took it everywhere—and in part a testament to its openness to different political readings. But however much the fables' brevity and didacticism strike us as appropriate for children, we...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.085

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.005
Science and technology studies0.0040.009
Scholarly communication0.0130.005
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJeunesse Young People Texts CulturesSame topicThemes in Literature AnalysisFrench-language works237,207