MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2910538528 · doi:10.4095/212117

Preliminary observations on the Cenozoic outliers of northeastern Ellesmere Island, Nunavut: sedimentology and stratigraphy of the syntectonic conglomerate units

2001· report· en· W2910538528 on OpenAlexaffabout
C Lee

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSedimentologyConglomerateGeologyStratigraphyCenozoicPaleontologyGeomorphologyGeochemistrySedimentary rockTectonicsStructural basin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Statistical and paleocurrent evidence provides insight into the origin of three (?) Late Paleocene conglomerate units of the Eurekan Orogen on Ellesmere Island. Point-count data display three distinct compositional trends within each area and reveal that the Cape Lawrence and Cape Back conglomerate units were likely derived from carbonate and siliciclastic rocks of Ordovician and Cambrian age, respectively. An abundance of siliciclastic rocks in the upper half of these successions suggests a normal unroofing scenario, as younger Ordovician carbonate clasts prevail below. A similar sequence (in addition to Silurian carbonate clasts) is observed at Franklin Pierce Bay, where paleocurrent directions show an east and southeast transport direction. In contrast, north to northeast directions dominate at Cape Lawrence whereas northeast, southwest, and northwest directions dominate at Cape Back. These paleocurrent variations correspond to changes in rock types.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.514
Threshold uncertainty score0.965

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological Studies and Exploration→French-language works237,207→