MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2910538712 · doi:10.1161/jaha.118.010107

Cardiac biomarkers and left ventricular hypertrophy in relation to outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation: Experiences from the RE-LY trial

2019· article· en· W2910538712 on OpenAlexaff
Ziad Hijazi, Paolo Verdecchia, Jonas Oldgren, Ulrika Andersson, Gianpaolo Reboldi, Giuseppe Di Pasquale, Giovanni Mazzotta, Fabio Angeli, John W. Eikelboom, Michael D. Ezekowitz, Stuart J. Connolly, Salim Yusuf, Lars Wallentin

Bibliographic record

VenueIrInSubria (University of Insubria) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsPopulation Health Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCardiologyInternal medicineMedicineAtrial fibrillationHazard ratioLeft ventricular hypertrophyNatriuretic peptideTroponinTroponin TProportional hazards modelStroke (engine)GDF15BiomarkerHeart failureMyocardial infarctionConfidence intervalBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Cardiac biomarkers and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) are related to the risk of stroke and death in patients with atrial fibrillation. We investigated the interrelationship between LVH and cardiac biomarkers and their independent associations with outcomes. Methods and Results Plasma samples were obtained at baseline in 5275 patients with atrial fibrillation in the RE-LY (Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy) trial. NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide), cardiac troponin I and T, and growth differentiation factor-15 were determined using high-sensitivity (hs) assays. LVH was defined by ECG. Cox models were adjusted for baseline characteristics, LVH, and biomarkers. LVHwas present in 1257 patients. During a median follow-up of 2.0 years, 165 patients developed a stroke and 370 died. LVHwas significantly (P<0.0001) associated with higher levels of all biomarkers in linear regression analyses adjusting for baseline characteristics. Geometric mean ratios (95% CIs) were as follows: NT-proBNP, 1.32 (1.25-1.38); hs cardiac troponin I, 1.67 (1.57-1.78); hs troponin T, 1.38 (1.32-1.44); and growth differentiation factor-15, 1.09 (1.05-1.12). For stroke, the hazard ratios (95% CIs) per 50% increase were as follows: NT-proBNP, 1.09 (1.00-1.19); hs cardiac troponin I, 1.09 (1.03-1.15); hs troponin T, 1.14 (1.06-1.24); and growth differentiation factor-15, 1.22 (1.08-1.38) (all P<0.05). For death, hazard ratios (95% CIs) were as follows: NT-proBNP, 1.24 (1.17-1.31); hs cardiac troponin I, 1.13 (1.10-1.17); hs troponin T, 1.28 (1.23-1.34); and growth differentiation factor-15, 1.31 (1.22-1.42) (all P<0.0001). LVH was not significantly associated with stroke or death after adjustment for biomarkers. Conclusions Cardiac biomarkers are significantly associated with LVH. The prognostic value of biomarkers for stroke and death is not affected by LVH. The prognostic information of LVH is attenuated in the presence of cardiac biomarkers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIrInSubria (University of Insubria)Same topicAtrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207