MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2910663382 · doi:10.4095/215739

Subsurface Proterozoic stratigraphy and tectonics of the western plains of the Northwest Territories

2004· report· en· W2910663382 on OpenAlexaffabout
D G Cook, B C MacLean

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProterozoicGeologyStratigraphyTectonicsPaleontologyArchaeologyGeomorphologyEarth scienceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reflection seismic records from the northwestern plains of the Northwest Territories reveal about 14 km of Proterozoic strata deformed to varying degrees, including spectacular large-scale faults and folds. The Proterozoic section, subdivided into four seismic assemblages representing five unconformity-bounded sequences, can be reasonably correlated with outcropping strata on Coppermine Homocline and Brock Inlier to the east and in the Cordillera to the west. Correlations are based largely on recognizing similar stratigraphic and tectonic histories. The HB Assemblage at the base of the subsurface stratigraphic column contains two unconformity-bounded sequences, the lower of which is correlated with the Bigbear and Fault River formations (of the Hornby Bay Group) on Coppermine Homocline, and with the Wernecke Supergroup in the Cordillera. The upper sequence, comprising the Basinal, Platformal, and Syntectonic units (of the HB Assemblage), is correlated with the deltaic Lady Nye Formation, platformal East River Formation, and syntectonic Kaertok and LeRoux formations, (of the Hornby Bay Group) on Coppermine Homocline, but has no known correlatives in the Cordillera. The DL Assemblage is the third sequence and is correlated with the Dismal Lakes Group on Coppermine Homocline, and the Pinguicula Group in the Cordillera. The fourth sequence, the Tweed Lake Assemblage, is correlated with the Coppermine River Group on Coppermine Homocline (a correlation supported by chemical analyses of basalts) and has no known correlative in the Cordillera. The fifth and stratigraphically highest sequence, the M/S Assemblage, is correlated with the Shaler Supergroup on Coppermine Homocline, and the Mackenzie Mountains Supergroup and Hematite Creek Group in the Cordillera (correlations that are supported by the presence of 'Grenville-age' detrital zircons, and macro- and microfossils). The subsurface tectonic history includes compressional and extensional events, and parallels remarkably well the history of Coppermine Homocline. The most important compressional event, the thick-skinned, intracratonic Forward Orogeny, identified in the subsurface and on Coppermine Homocline, is probably related to the Racklan Orogeny, identified in the Wernecke Mountains of the Cordillera. Forward Orogeny basement-cored structures affected HB Assemblage and older strata and were peneplaned by regional erosion before deposition of the DL Assemblage and correlative strata. The most important extensional event postdated DL Assemblage deposition and occurred primarily as a reactivation of Forward Orogeny faults. Other structures include early extensional faults related to Basinal Unit subsidence, and late, long-wavelength folds affecting the Tweed Lake Assemblage, M/S Assemblage, and correlative strata. Strong, discordant seismic reflections are mostly interpreted as representing intrusive sheets that are correlated with Western Channel Diabase sheets on Coppermine Homocline. Younger sheets imaged in M/S Assemblage strata are correlated with the Tsezotene sills exposed in the Mackenzie Mountains. The Cambrian Mackenzie Trough, grabens and half-grabens developed at various times (Early Cambrian, post-Devonian/ pre-Cretaceous, and post-Cretaceous), the transpressional (Laramide?) Colville Hills, and the Laramide Imperial Anticline, are all Phanerozoic elements whose development was influenced by Proterozoic history.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.501
Threshold uncertainty score0.911

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological Studies and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207