MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2910674378 · doi:10.1109/imcet.2018.8603038

Blind Image Watermarking using Normalized STDM robust against Fixed Gain Attack

2018· preprint· en· W2910674378 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Makram W. Hatoum, Rony Darazi, Jean-François Couchot

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueAgence Universitaire de la FrancophonieAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsDigital watermarkingRobustness (evolution)Quantization (signal processing)Additive white Gaussian noiseComputer scienceDitherGaussian noiseAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceWhite noiseComputer visionImage (mathematics)TelecommunicationsNoise shaping

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Spread Transform Dither Modulation (STDM), as an extension of Quantization Index Modulation (QIM) is a blind watermarking scheme that achieves high robustness against random noise and re-quantization attacks, with a limitation against the Fixed Gain Attack (FGA). In this paper, we improve the STDM watermarking scheme by making the quantization step size dependent on the watermarked content to resist the FGA attack. Simulations on real images show that our approach achieves strong robustness against the FGA attack, the Additive White Gaussian Noise (AWGN) attack, and the JPEG compression attack while preserving a higher level of transparency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Steganography and Watermarking TechniquesFrench-language works237,207