Residential Power Forecasting Using Load Identification and Graph Spectral Clustering
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Forecasting energy or power usage is an important part of providing a stable supply of power to all customers on a power grid. We present a novel method that aims to forecast the power consumption of a single house, or a set of houses, based on non-intrusive load monitoring (NILM) and graph spectral clustering. In the proposed method, the aggregate power signal is decomposed into individual appliance signals and each appliance's power is forecasted separately. Then the total power forecast is formed by aggregating forecasted power levels of individual appliances. We use four publicly available datasets (reference energy disaggregation dataset, rainforest automation energy, almanac of minutely power dataset version 2, tracebase) to test our forecasting method and report its accuracy. The results show that our method is more accurate compared to popular existing approaches, such as autoregressive integrated moving average, similar profile load forecast, artificial neural network, and recent NILM-based forecasting.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it