MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2910706918 · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1800081

Cadmium Induces Glomerular Endothelial Cell–Specific Expression of Complement Factor H via the −1635 AP-1 Binding Site

2019· article· en· W2910706918 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaocui Chen, Liqun Li, Fuhong Liu, Josephine Hoh, Carolyn Kapron, Ju Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Immunology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicPhagocytosis and Immune Regulation
Canadian institutionsTrent University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryCadmiumCell biologyBinding siteComplement (music)Molecular biologyBiochemistryBiologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Cadmium (Cd) is an environmental toxin that induces nephrotoxicity. Complement factor H (CFH), an inhibitor of complement activation, is involved in the pathogenesis of various renal diseases. In this study, we investigated the effects of Cd on CFH production by the kidney. In C57B6/J mice, an increased CFH level was found in renal blood and glomerular endothelial cells after Cd treatment. In vitro, Cd induces an increased CFH secretion and mRNA expression in human renal glomerular endothelial cells but not in human podocytes or human mesangial cells. Cd activates the JNK pathway and increases c-Jun and c-Fos in human renal glomerular endothelial cells. A JNK inhibitor, SP600125, specifically abolishes Cd-induced CFH production. By chromatin immunoprecipitation assay and EMSA, the −1635 AP-1 motif on human CFH promoter was identified as the binding element for c-Jun and c-Fos. In a luciferase activity assay, mutation of the AP1 site eliminates Cd-induced increase of CFH promoter activity. Thus, the −1635 AP-1 motif on the CFH promoter region mediates Cd-inducible CFH gene expression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of ImmunologySame topicPhagocytosis and Immune RegulationFrench-language works237,207