MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2910722053

LINCDIRE: ne approche actionnelle pour des compétences plurilingues et pluriculturelles

2018· article· fr· W2910722053 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Enrica Piccardo, Coralie Payre-Ficout, Aline Germain Rutherford, Nicola Townend

Bibliographic record

Venue˜Les œLangues modernes · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Language Learning Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceSociologyPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article propose une nouvelle vision de l’education aux langues. Apres une presentation du projet LINCDIRE (LINguistic and Cultural DIversity REinvented) et de ses fondements epistemologiques, ainsi que du modele theorique qui a ete developpe, nous nous interesserons a l’elaboration de deux scenarios d’enseignement/apprentissage des langues secondes/etrangeres : un scenario d’allemand pour des eleves canadiens du secondaire et un scenario d’anglais pour de jeunes ecoliers francophones. Pour chacun des deux contextes institutionnels, nous exposerons les roles et les enjeux de l’utilisation des scenarios bases sur le modele elabore au cours du projet LINCDIRE.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.770
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜Les œLangues modernesSame topicFrench Language Learning MethodsFrench-language works237,207