MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2910729983 · doi:10.4095/292389

New data from Late Ordovician-Early Silurian Mount Kindle Formation measured sections, Franklin Mountains and eastern Mackenzie Mountains, Northwest Territories

2013· report· en· W2910729983 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mike Pope, Stephen A. Leslie

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrdovicianMountGeologyPaleontologyArchaeologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Four measured sections of the Late Ordovician-Early Silurian Mount Kindle Formation near Norman Wells, Northwest Territories indicate this unit was deposited on a shallowly dipping carbonate ramp that was subsequently dolomitized. The most shoreward facies are tidal flats that pass basinward into skeletal packstone-grainstone deposited on the ramp crest. Basinward of the ramp crest are burrowed skeletal wackestone-packstone passing downramp into skeletal wackestone or mudstone with nodular chert. The abundance of macrofauna (corals, stromatoporoids, brachiopods, bryozoans, sponges, and crinoids) in this unit indicates that it formed in warm water. The majority of the macrofauna was silicified postdepositionally. Preliminary conodont analysis indicates the base of the Mount Kindle Formation is Late Ordovician (Katian). There is a marked faunal change at a lithological break between shallow-water open-marine skeletal packstone and overlying cherty skeletal mudstone interpreted to be the Ordovician-Silurian unconformity that subdivides the Mount Kindle Formation into two separate sequences.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.255
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological Studies and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207