MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2910742660 · doi:10.4095/212674

Baddeleyite U-Pb age of metadiabase near Key Harbour, Britt domain, Grenville Province, Ontario; Radiogenic age and isotopic studies: Report 14

2001· report· en· W2910742660 on OpenAlexaffabout
A Davidson, O van Breemen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBaddeleyiteRadiogenic nuclideGeochemistryHarbourKey (lock)GeologyZirconMantle (geology)Computer scienceComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many occurrences of metadiabase in the parautochthonous belt of the Grenville Province in Ontario have a geochemical signature indistinguishable from that of Sudbury diabase in the adjacent Superior and Southern provinces, and some bodies close to the Grenville Front are known to have the same ca. 1.24 Ga age. However, dating of baddeleyite in metadiabase with Sudbury-type chemistry from a small mass enclosed in orthogneiss near Key Harbour shows it to be at least 200 Maolder than Sudbury diabase, which casts doubt on the use of rock chemistry as a correlation tool for tracing the extent of Sudbury metadiabase within the parautochthon. Despite this, the common chemical signature of metadiabase of whatever age in the parautochthonous footwall of the allochthon boundary thrust zone serves as a distinction from the 1.17 1.15 Ga coronitic metagabbro in the hanging wall, the two being spatially mutually exclusive.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.086

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological and Geochemical Analysis→French-language works237,207→