MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2910820964 · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1710775

Single-Dose Tafenoquine to Prevent Relapse of <i>Plasmodium vivax</i> Malaria

2019· article· en· W2910820964 on OpenAlexaff
Marcus Lacerda, Alejandro Llanos‐Cuentas, Srivicha Krudsood, Chanthap Lon, David Saunders, Rezika Mohammed, Daniel Yilma, Dhélio B. Pereira, Fe Esperanza Espino, Reginaldo Z. Mia, Raúl Chuquiyauri, Fernando Val, Martín Casapía, Wuelton Marcelo Monteiro, Marcelo Augusto Mota Brito, Mônica Regina Farias Costa, Nillawan Buathong, Harald Noedl, Ermias Diro, Sisay Getie, Kalehiwot M. Wubie, Alemseged Abdissa, Ahmed Zeynudin, Cherinet Abebe, Mauro Shugiro Tada, Françoise Brand, Hans‐Peter Beck, Brian Angus, Stephan Duparc, Jőrg‐Peter Kleim, Lynda Kellam, Victoria M. Rousell, Siôn W. Jones, Elizabeth Hardaker, Khadeeja Mohamed, Donna D. Clover, Kim Fletcher, John Breton, Cletus O. Ugwuegbulam, Justin A. Green, Gavin Koh

Bibliographic record

VenueNew England Journal of Medicine · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMalaria Research and Control
Canadian institutionsNickel Institute
FundersMedicines for Malaria VentureGlaxoSmithKline
KeywordsPlasmodium vivaxMalariaPrimaquineMedicineVivax malariaVirologyPlasmodium (life cycle)Plasmodium falciparumImmunologyChloroquineComputer scienceParasite hosting

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Treatment of Plasmodium vivax malaria requires the clearing of asexual parasites, but relapse can be prevented only if dormant hypnozoites are cleared from the liver (a treatment termed "radical cure"). Tafenoquine is a single-dose 8-aminoquinoline that has recently been registered for the radical cure of P. vivax. METHODS: This multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in Ethiopia, Peru, Brazil, Cambodia, Thailand, and the Philippines. We enrolled 522 patients with microscopically confirmed P. vivax infection (>100 to <100,000 parasites per microliter) and normal glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) activity (with normal activity defined as ≥70% of the median value determined at each trial site among 36 healthy male volunteers who were otherwise not involved in the trial). All patients received a 3-day course of chloroquine (total dose of 1500 mg). In addition, patients were assigned to receive a single 300-mg dose of tafenoquine on day 1 or 2 (260 patients), placebo (133 patients), or a 15-mg dose of primaquine once daily for 14 days (129 patients). The primary outcome was the Kaplan-Meier estimated percentage of patients who were free from recurrence at 6 months, defined as P. vivax clearance without recurrent parasitemia. RESULTS: In the intention-to-treat population, the percentage of patients who were free from recurrence at 6 months was 62.4% in the tafenoquine group (95% confidence interval [CI], 54.9 to 69.0), 27.7% in the placebo group (95% CI, 19.6 to 36.6), and 69.6% in the primaquine group (95% CI, 60.2 to 77.1). The hazard ratio for the risk of recurrence was 0.30 (95% CI, 0.22 to 0.40) with tafenoquine as compared with placebo (P<0.001) and 0.26 (95% CI, 0.18 to 0.39) with primaquine as compared with placebo (P<0.001). Tafenoquine was associated with asymptomatic declines in hemoglobin levels, which resolved without intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Single-dose tafenoquine resulted in a significantly lower risk of P. vivax recurrence than placebo in patients with phenotypically normal G6PD activity. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline and Medicines for Malaria Venture; DETECTIVE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01376167 .).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations289
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNew England Journal of MedicineSame topicMalaria Research and ControlFrench-language works237,207