Effects of different cooking methods on minerals, vitamins and nutritional quality indices of grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the nutritional value (proximate composition, fatty acid \nprofiles, vitamins and minerals) contents and also nutritional quality indices (NQI)) of \ngrass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella) prepared according to common consumer \ntechniques: raw, poached, steamed, microwaved, pan-fried and deep-fried (in olive oil). \nIn comparison to raw fish fillets, when grass carp was cooked there was an increase in \nprotein, lipid and ash contents. Cooking methods had no significant effect on total n-3 \nfatty acids except for frying fillets. Lowest and highest content of n-3 was shown in \ndeep-fried and pan-fried samples, respectively. Total n-6 fatty acid of cooked samples \nincreased in comparison to raw samples. Na, K, Mg, P and Zn contents of boiled fish \nfillets significantly decreased. None of cooking methods had a significant effect a \nvitamin D. However, vitamin A, B_1 and B_3 contents of cooked fish significantly \ndecreased.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".