MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2910880318 · doi:10.1002/9781119427896.ch1

The Lignans

2019· other· en· W2910880318 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant-derived Lignans Synthesis and Bioactivity
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLignanChemoselectivityChemistryComputational biologyCombinatorial chemistryBiochemical engineeringStereochemistryBiologyOrganic chemistryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lignan natural products have been synthetic targets for decades due to their biological activities and varied structural motifs. Significant work has been carried out to understand the lignan biosynthetic pathway as a potential starting point for accessing these complex molecules. The isolation of many of the key enzymes has confirmed the remarkable abilities of plants to transform a relatively small number of simple building blocks into thousands of structurally different compounds. Despite this knowledge, biomimetic approaches have suffered from issues of regio- and chemoselectivity. We provide a comprehensive review of the literature on recent synthetic approaches to this class of molecules. Bio-inspired methods that access a key intermediate in the synthesis of different classes of lignans have gained significant attention. Additionally, several synthetic pathways have been developed that access specific structural cores with high efficiency and stereoselectivity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.491

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it