MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2910880950 · doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107608

Development of a field dependent Prandtl-Ishlinskii model for magnetorheological elastomers

2019· article· en· W2910880950 on OpenAlexafffund
Ashkan Dargahi, Subhash Rakheja, Ramin Sedaghati

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterials & Design · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVibration Control and Rheological Fluids
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMagnetorheological fluidMaterials scienceHysteresisAmplitudeNonlinear systemMagnetorheological elastomerMagnetic fieldExcitationMechanicsPrandtl numberControl theory (sociology)Condensed matter physicsPhysicsComputer scienceOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Magnetorheological elastomers (MREs) offer real-time controllable stiffness and damping properties, and strong hysteresis in the stress-strain responses that depends on magnetic field intensity, strain amplitude and strain rate in a highly nonlinear manner. Prediction of hysteretic stress-strain behavior is essential for effective designs of controllable MRE-based devices. This study presents a stop operator-based Prandtl-Ishlinskii (PI) model for predicting nonlinear hysteresis properties of MREs as functions of the strain amplitude, excitation frequency and magnetic flux density. The stress-strain properties of a MRE fabricated with 40% volume fraction iron particles were experimentally characterized in the shear mode under broad ranges of strain amplitude (2.5–20%), excitation frequency (0.1–50 Hz) and magnetic flux densities (0–450 mT). Subsequently, a stop operator-based classical PI model was formulated considering only 10 hysteresis operators, which required identification of only four parameters. The validity of the classical PI model was assessed using the laboratory-measured data. The proposed classical model is further generalized to enable predictions of MRE dynamic behavior independent of the loading conditions, which would be beneficial for developments in controllable MRE-based adaptive devices. The results demonstrated that the generalized model could accurately characterize nonlinear hysteresis properties of the MRE under the ranges of loading conditions and magnetic field considered.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations52
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaterials & DesignSame topicVibration Control and Rheological FluidsFrench-language works237,207