MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2910887450 · doi:10.4095/220785

High-resolution isotope geochemistry of the gas-hydrate-free gas transition in the JAPEX/JNOC/GSC et al. Mallik 5L-38 gas hydrate production research well

2005· report· en· W2910887450 on OpenAlexaff
A Ethier, Ian Clark, S R Dallimore, Ryo Matsumoto, Paul Middlestead

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClathrate hydrateHydrateGeologyGeochemistryChemistryMineralogyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Drillcore from the gas hydrate-free gas transition zone in the Mallik 5L-38 gas hydrate production research well was subsampled at a 2 cm resolution and pore waters were vacuum extracted. Variations in major-ion geochemistry and ?18O values are retained at the 2 to 3 cm scale, with trends developing at scales greater than 20 cm. Above the transition, d18O (-14 ± 1.0%ø) and chloride (278 ± 97 mmol/L) values suggest a precursor pore water of roughly 50% seawater and low-d18O freshwater, and have an inverse correlation due to pore-water freshening during gas hydrate decomposition. Below the transition, excess chloride (622 ± 125 mmol/L) and low d18O (-11.4 ± 3.3%ø) values suggest downward diffusion of solutes following gas hydrate formation. The low d18Ofreshwater is glacial meltwater infiltrating along permeable sediment units during periods of glaciation and low sea level. Sulphate anomalies indicate the presence of readily oxidized sulphide minerals from sulphate reduction prior to gas hydrate growth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.951
Threshold uncertainty score0.097

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena→French-language works237,207→