MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2910913198 · doi:10.3166/i2m.17.605-623

Energy harvesting for IoT road monitoring systems

2018· article· fr· W2910913198 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInstrumentation Mesure Métrologie · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEngineering
TopicInnovative Energy Harvesting Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternet of ThingsEnergy harvestingComputer scienceEnergy (signal processing)Environmental scienceTransport engineeringArchitectural engineeringEngineeringEmbedded system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Internet of Things (IoT) solutions guarantee the high performance requested by users and authorities in terms of efficiency, sustainability, connectivity, and durability for modern transportation infrastructures, allowing, at the same time, small size, low power consumption, wireless transmission and easily deployable solutions.IoT monitoring systems powered through Energy Harvesting Technologies (EHTs) are often indicated as the most efficient solutions to address these requests because of several advantages (e.g., remote management simplification, independence from electricity grid).In this paper, the most used EHTs in the field of road infrastructures were analyzed and, among them, a photovoltaic standalone system (PVSS) was selected and considered as the power supply unit of an electronic structural health monitoring (SHM) system.In particular, a network of sensor units (SUs), wirelessly connected to one central unit (CU), acting as an innovative road pavement monitoring system solution was taken in account as benchmark.Consequently, the objective of this study is to draw guidelines for the designer that can establish the proper sizing of the PVSS, based on the energy consumption of the SHM system, according to multiple factors, such as typology and number of sensors, frequency of measurements, duty cycle, and days of autonomy. RÉSUMÉ. Les solutions d'Internet des objets (IdO) garantissent la haute performance demandée par les utilisateurs et les autorités en termes d'efficacité, de durabilité, de connectivité et de durabilité pour les infrastructures de transport modernes, permettant à la fois une petite dimension, une faible consommation d'énergie, une transmission sans fil et des solutions faciles à dé ployer. Les systèmes de surveillance d'IdO alimentés par les technologies de récolte d'énergie (EHTs, le sigle de « Energy Harvesting Technologies » en anglais) sont souvent indiqué s comme les solutions les plus efficaces pour ré pondre à ces demandes en raison de plusieurs avantages (par exemple, la simplification de la gestion à distance, l'indé pendance du ré seau é lectrique). Dans cet article, les EHTs les plus souvent utilisé es dans le domaine des infrastructures routiè res ont é té analysé s et, parmi eux, un systè me photovoltaï que autonome (PVSS, le sigle606 I2M.Volume 17 -n° 4/2018 de « photovoltaic standalone system » en anglais) a é té sé lectionné et considé ré comme l'unité d'alimentation é lectrique d'un systè me é lectronique de contrôle de santé inté gré (CSI).En particulier, un ré seau d'unité s de capteurs (SU, le sigle de « sensor unit » en anglais) connecté sans fil à une unité centrale (CU, le sigle de « central unit » en anglais) qui fonctionne en tant que solution des systè mes de surveillance des chaussé es routiè res innovantes a été pris en compte comme standard.Par conséquent, l'objectif de cette étude est d'élaborer des lignes directrices pour le concepteur en eux permettant d'établir le bon dimensionnement du PVSS, en fonction de la consommation d'énergie du système de CSI anisi que des multiples facteurs, tels que la typologie et le nombre de capteurs, la fré quence des mesures., cycle de travail et jours d'autonomie.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.734
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it