MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2910917307 · doi:10.4095/212249

Geology of the northern margin of the Trans-Hudson Orogen (Foxe Fold Belt), central Baffin Island, Nunavut

2001· report· en· W2910917307 on OpenAlexaffabout
D Corrigan, D J Scott, M R St-Onge

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyFold (higher-order function)Margin (machine learning)PaleontologySeismology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The northern flank of the Trans-Hudson Orogen on central Baffin Island comprises, from north to south 1) reworked Archean basement (Rae Province); 2) the Paleoproterozoic Piling Group, which comprises a lower, pas- sive-margin sequence (Dewar Lakes and Flint Lake formations) and an upper, foredeep sequence (Astarte River and Longstaff Bluff formations); 3) a mafic volcanic thrust sheet (Bravo Lake formation); and 4) a metamor- phic-plutonic internal zone. Field relationships suggest that the contact between the Piling Group and the underly- ing Archean basement is a reworked unconformity. Locally, the contact is obscured by the presence of large biotite syeno- to monzogranite plutons that crosscut both the Piling Group and the Archean basement. Four distinct tectonometamorphic episodes are recorded, with an earlier, middle-amphibolite-facies Archean event (D 1A ), two compressional Paleoproterozoic events (D 1P and D 2P ), and a late cross-folding event (D 3P ) that produced a set of basement culminations in the southern portion of the map area.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.115
Threshold uncertainty score0.230

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological and Geochemical Analysis→French-language works237,207→