MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2910933979 · doi:10.4095/211176

Pleistocene ice outlets on the central Scotian Slope, offshore Nova Scotia

2000· report· en· W2910933979 on OpenAlexaffabout
David J. W. Piper

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNova scotiaGeologyPleistoceneSubmarine pipelineNova (rocket)OceanographyArchaeologyGeographyPaleontologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The style of Quaternary sedimentation on the central Scotian Slope near the Shelburne G-29 well is interpreted from seismic reflection profiles. Three types of shelf-edge ice margin produced different styles of sediment accumulation in the later Quaternary on the slope. 1) Ice margins of ice streams persisted for many thousands of years at the shelf edge and resulted in active sedimentation of coarse, channelled deposits, and debris flows. 2) Seaward of outer shelf banks, ice advance onto the upper slope was short lived and sedimentation was dominated by fallout from ice-margin plumes. 3) Under intermediate conditions, ice advance deposited upper slope till and subglacial meltwater cut gullies, but active sedimentation seaward of a broad ice front was lacking. These ice-margin facies overlie an early Quaternary prodeltaic margin and a major debris-flow deposit. The Quaternary sediments are offset by slope-parallel faults that have provided pathways for mud diapirs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.142
Threshold uncertainty score0.285

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research→French-language works237,207→