MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2910949901 · doi:10.24908/pceea.v0i0.13064

Engineering Teaching and Learning Fellows as a Catalyst of Change Management in Engineering Education

2018· article· en· W2910949901 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Deena Salem, Brian Frank

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicComplex Systems and Decision Making
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSituatedContext (archaeology)Situated learningPerspective (graphical)Engineering educationQuality (philosophy)MacroEngineering ethicsEngineeringSociologyKnowledge managementPedagogyPsychologyEngineering managementComputer scienceGeographyArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

–In this paper, the authors present an ethnographical study of Engineering Teaching and Learning Fellows (ETLFs). This paper is part of a longitudinal study that proposes an ecological model of higher education, adapted from Bronfenbrenner’s ecological systems theory including, micro, meso, exo, and macro environments. Froyd’s change strategies in the academic engineering context are embedded in this social model, together with a different perspective of how ETLFs are situated as catalysts of change management in engineering education. The objective of this study is to provide insight to different stakeholders who are interested in improving the quality of undergraduate students’ learning about how the ETLFs can support the changes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.005
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)Same topicComplex Systems and Decision MakingFrench-language works237,207