MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2910953848 · doi:10.7202/1055115ar

CHANGEMENTS CLIMATIQUES, AUTONOMIE DE LA NATURE ET SOUFFRANCE ANIMALE : REPENSER LES FRONTIÈRES ENTRE L’ÉTHIQUE ANIMALE ET L’ÉTHIQUE ENVIRONNEMENTALE

2018· article· fr· W2910953848 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Ely Mermans

Bibliographic record

VenueLes ateliers de l éthique · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Philosophy and Ethics
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CHANGEMENTS CLIMATIQUES, AUTONOMIE DE LA NATURE ET SOUFFRANCE ANIMALE : REPENSER LES FRONTIÈRES ENTRE L’ÉTHIQUE ANIMALE ET L’ÉTHIQUE ENVIRONNEMENTALE : introduction. An article from journal Les ateliers de l'éthique / The Ethics Forum (Volume 13, Number 1, Winter 2018, pp. 1-230), on Érudit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.459
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLes ateliers de l éthiqueSame topicEnvironmental Philosophy and EthicsFrench-language works237,207