MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2910974230 · doi:10.4095/212092

Preliminary results of relative ice-movement chronology of the Laughland Lake map area, Nunavut

2001· report· en· W2910974230 on OpenAlexaffabout
E C Little

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChronologyMovement (music)GeologyPhysical geographyArchaeologyGeographyPaleontologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Preliminary surficial materials mapping at a 1:100 000 scale within the Laughland Lake (NTS 56 K) map area has 1) refined the previously mapped distribution and abundance of glacial sediments, and 2) elucidated at least four different episodes of ice movement. The oldest of the ice-movement sequences appears to have originated from an ice divide located northeast of the study area; this particular episode most likely predates the last glacial maxi-mum, possibly related to early Wisconsinan (d 18 O stage 4) or penultimate glacial (d 18 O stage 6) ice dynamics. The younger ice-movement indicators are related to last glacial maximum and post-last glacial maximum events. Ice-movement indicators associated with the last glacial maximum sensu stricto generally scatter about due north (~355°-005°), whereas those related to post-last glacial maximum events suggest west-northwest followed by north-northwest ice movements. These data also have implications pertaining to the evolution of last glacial maxi- mum and post-last glacial maximum ice divides.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.357
Threshold uncertainty score0.719

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicClimate change and permafrost→French-language works237,207→