MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2910986166 · doi:10.5539/cis.v12n1p49

Research and Improvement Method Based on k-mean Clustering Algorithm

2019· article· en· W2910986166 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Guohua Zhang, Kangting Zhao, Yi Li

Bibliographic record

VenueComputer and Information Science · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicGrey System Theory Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCluster analysisComputer scienceOutlierSensitivity (control systems)Noise (video)AlgorithmFilter (signal processing)CURE data clustering algorithmCorrelation clusteringArtificial intelligenceComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In view of the sensitivity of the traditional mean algorithm to outliers and noise points, an improved mean algorithm is proposed in this paper, which is based on the density of the distribution of objects in space. In the measurement of density, the sensitivity of clustering effect to initial parameters is reduced. The improved algorithm can filter the "noise" data and discover the clustering of arbitrary shapes, which is obviously superior to the standard mean algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.432
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComputer and Information ScienceSame topicGrey System Theory ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207