Experimental study of hydrodynamics and bubble size distribution of an external loop airlift reactor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The most important factors influencing the performance of an external loop airlift reactor (ELALR) are local hydrodynamics and bubble size distribution (BSD). In this work, we studied the hydrodynamic characters and BSD in a laboratory scale ELALR. The velocity field of the riser was captured using the particle image velocimetry (PIV) technique and the bubble size distribution (BSD) was determined by digital image analysis (DIA). The results of the PIV measurement show that the flow has an unsteady structure, and the wake oscillation phenomena of the bubble and the vortex shedding are periodically asymmetrical. The gas holdup calculated by DIA correlates with the experimental data when the superficial gas velocity is < 0.02 m · s −1 . With an increase in the superficial gas velocity, the probability density function (PDF) curve becomes flatter, changing from the unimodal to the bimodal. For the bimodal PDF curve, the peak of the small bubble is ∼1.5 mm, while the peak of lager bubble shifts from 4.5 to 5.5 mm with the increase in the superficial gas velocity. This work helps to provide insight into the mixing performance of the ELALR.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".