MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2911042490 · doi:10.4095/212684

Reconnaissance gamma-ray spectrometry studies of the Paleoproterozoic Piling Group and adjacent Archean basement rocks, central Baffin Island, Nunavut

2001· report· en· W2911042490 on OpenAlexaffabout
K L Ford

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArcheanGeologyGroup (periodic table)BasementGeochemistryArchaeologyGeographyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the southern Melville Peninsula, strong radioactive element patterns, measured by reconnaissance airborne gamma-ray spectrometry, clearly discriminate Archean orthogneiss and various Archean and Proterozoic plutonic rocks. Similar geological units occur in the central Baffin Island region. In 2000, a brief field study was conducted in central Baffin Island to determine if radioactive element (K, eU, and eTh) variations measured by ground gamma-ray spectrometry can be used to assist ongoing geological mapping activities. Although radioactive element concentrations are generally low in the supracrustal rocks of the Piling Group, variation in K and eTh concentrations are associated with lithological variations. Basement rocks, composed of Archean orthogneiss and various Archean and Proterozoic granitic intrusions, produce strong radioactive element contrasts. Young pegmatite plutons can be distinguished from older intrusions by low eTh concentrations and high eU/eTh ratios. Various Archean and Proterozoic intrusions also have characteristic radioactive element signatures which distinguish them from Archean orthogneiss.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.453
Threshold uncertainty score0.912

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological Studies and Exploration→French-language works237,207→