MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2911065620 · doi:10.1145/3287624.3287713

XOMA

2019· article· en· W2911065620 on OpenAlexaff
Hyeonuk Sim, Jason H. Anderson, Jongeun Lee

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Neural Network Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Research Foundation of KoreaUlsan National Institute of Science and Technology
KeywordsComputer scienceApplication-specific integrated circuitEnergy consumptionLatency (audio)Embedded systemChipComputer architectureMemory architectureEfficient energy useParallel computingAuxiliary memoryInferenceComputer hardwareArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

State-of-the-art deep neural networks (DNNs) require hundreds of millions of multiply-accumulate (MAC) computations to perform inference, e.g. in image-recognition tasks. To improve the performance and energy efficiency, deep learning accelerators have been proposed, realized both on FPGAs and as custom ASICs. Generally, such accelerators comprise many parallel processing elements, capable of executing large numbers of concurrent MAC operations. From the energy perspective, however, most consumption arises due to memory accesses, both to off-chip external memory, and on-chip buffers. In this paper, we propose an on-chip DNN co-processor architecture where minimizing memory accesses is the primary design objective. To the maximum possible extent, off-chip memory accesses are eliminated, providing lowest-possible energy consumption for inference. Compared to a state-of-the-art ASIC, our architecture requires 36% fewer external memory accesses and 53% less energy consumption for low-latency image classification.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.839
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207