EXTECH IV Athabasca uranium multidisciplinary study of northern Saskatchewan and Alberta, Part 2: current results of subprojects 1 to 5
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fifteen subprojects aim to enhance the geoscience framework and EXploration TECHnology for the world-class McArthur River camp as an aid to uranium exploration in the Athabasca Basin and elsewhere. Subprojects 1 to 5, reported on here, mainly serve as a framework to help focus technology: 1) seismic imaging of the stratigraphy, the unconformity, the P2 reverse-fault zone, possible alteration zones, the orebody itself, and a deep reflector possibly representing a mafic sill and heat source for hydrothermal convection; 2) quantitative linking of geophysical and geological parameters by multiparameter borehole geophysics; 3) determination of the paragenesis of organic matter, both Proterozoic and Phanerozoic (but all postdating the ore and therefore not a guide); 4) establishment of a quantitative lithological and sequence-stratigraphic framework across drill camps and six regional deposystems; 5) mapping, simplifying, and correlating basement domains and their boundaries; and 4a / 5a) relating uranium to reactivation structures and sedimentary style in paleovalleys.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".