MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2911073324 · doi:10.33319/sos.v19i2.5

Kajian Pelaksanaan Kode Etik Aparatur Sipil Negara (ASN) (Studi Kasus Pada Pelaksanaan Kode Etik Aparatur Sipil Negara di Pemerintahan Daerah Kabupaten Ngawi Provinsi Jawa Timur)

2019· article· en· W2911073324 on OpenAlexaff
Sangrila Puspita Dewi

Bibliographic record

VenueJURNAL SOSIAL Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal Studies and Policies
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompetence (human resources)SanctionsPublic administrationPolitical scienceBusiness administrationManagementBusinessLawEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To find out how far the application of code of Civil State Apparatus ethics conducted research with descriptive method using closed instrument and sample (n) 18 people of Local Government with case study in District Ngawi East Java Province, found employee perception to ethics organize good enough but need improvement of work quality through performance contracts, training, competence, rewards and sanctions, and performance evaluations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJURNAL SOSIAL Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu SosialSame topicLegal Studies and PoliciesFrench-language works237,207