MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2911103951 · doi:10.1088/1361-665x/aafdef

3D printed continuous wire polymer composites strain sensors for structural health monitoring

2019· article· en· W2911103951 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueSmart Materials and Structures · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdditive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMaterials scienceGauge factorNichromeComposite materialPiezoresistive effectUltimate tensile strengthElectrical resistance and conductanceStrain gaugeTensile testingComposite numberDeformation (meteorology)ModulusElastic modulusFabrication

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This study presents the electromechanical properties of three-dimensional (3D) printed unidirectional continuous wire polymer composite (CWPC) to study the correlation of the elastic mechanical deformation and the electrical resistance under uniaxial loading conditions. Two kinds of wires were used for this study: copper (Cu) and nichrome (NiCr). 3D printing was utilized due to its flexibility in design and structure for different applications. From mechanical testing, the NiCr CWPCs demonstrated an increase of 13.5% and 54% in ultimate tensile strength and Young’s modulus, respectively, compared to pure 3D printed Poly(lactic acid) while the Cu CWPC did not exhibit significant improvement in the mechanical properties. A direct linear relationship was observed between the applied tensile strain and the measured electrical resistance for both Cu and NiCr CWPCs indicating the ability of these 3D printed structures to be used as a sensor to measure stress/strain in the real time. In addition, the sensitivity of both composites in terms of gauge factor, representing the relative change in the electrical resistance with the tensile strain of the material, were found to be 1.17 ± 0.06 and 1.13 ± 0.07 for Cu and NiCr CWPCs, respectively. This sensitivity was compared with a simple analytical model and showed a good agreement with the experimental results. Finally, the reliability of these CWPCs was evaluated by conducting a cyclic loading test within their elastic ranges. The results of this work will enable the manufacture of integrated sensors within 3D printed components with improved mechanical properties and increased functionality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.068
Threshold uncertainty score0.829

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it