MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2911139074 · doi:10.4095/223790

Geological significance of gravity anomalies in the area of McArthur River uranium deposit, Athabasca Basin, Saskatchewan

2007· report· en· W2911139074 on OpenAlexaffabout
M D Thomas, Garnet Wood

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyStructural basinUraniumUranium oreGeochemistryMining engineeringHydrology (agriculture)GeomorphologyArchaeologyGeotechnical engineeringGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A gravity model is presented for a 27.2 km long, high-resolution gravity profile trending north-northwest across the mineralized P2 trend of the McArthur River uranium deposit. The model was derived in combination with magnetic modelling, and constrained by seismic data and interpretations, drillhole logs, and rock-property data. The crystalline basement is modelled as a series of units of pelitic, psammitic, and granitoid gneiss, separated generally by south-dipping, commonly steep contacts. The model supports an interpretation of the seismically defined south-dipping P2 fault as a thrust with steep splay faults in the hanging wall. It suggests also steep upthrusting within the Mudjatik Domain, and that the Mudjatik-Wollaston domain boundary is locally near vertical and possibly associated with flower structures. The McArthur River deposit is associated with a 0.4 mGal amplitude gravity high attributed to silicification accompanying mineralization. Several prospective silicification zones are modelled, most of which are rooted on metasedimentary units.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.087
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological Studies and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207